Copyright Pitfall No. 1: When Nature Inspires Your Art, Watch Out

By Tobias Butler, Attorney at Law

Copyright law is prejudiced against art that depicts nature. Faithful recreations of nature by themselves are simply not copyrightable. And, regardless of the beauty and innovation of a work of art, it can miss copyright protection if the artist fails to incorporate anything beyond exact elements from the natural world. So, in order to secure copyright protection, an artist needs to add his original touch to the work of art.

The Focus on Originality
You can only copyright something that is an original work of authorship. In understanding this, two issues are simple: 

  • A "work" is a single expression of an idea (and not an idea itself).
  • "Authorship" means you thought up the work.

So, the crux is "originality", requiring that the artist added something from his or her own mind (which, then cannot be copied).

Originality in Nature-Based Works
Most of the time, depictions of nature can’t be copyrighted. That is because the law (i.e. society) says that nature is not artistically your own. Only the part of the artistic work that sets nature apart from the way you found it is copyrightable (for instance, your arrangement, positioning, shading, unique coloring, etc.).

Some examples:

  • A candle company places cinnamon sticks on the front of a box of cinnamon-scented gifts (Yankee Candle v. Bridgewater Candle, 259 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 2001)). The company can’t gain protection over putting cinnamon sticks on a gift box because cinnamon sticks are a natural thing. But, the company can get protection over the placement of the cinnamon sticks in a specific pattern and the shading, light source and placement on the box because those were arrangement-based and, thus, original elements.
  • A photographer takes a shot of a ballerina’s legs in fifth position (Edwards v. Ruffner, 623 F.Supp. 511 (D.N.Y. 1985)). The photographer can’t get protection over a photograph of a dancer’s legs in fifth position (even if another photographer admits to seeing the photo and using it as inspiration for a similar photo) because even the idea of dancers legs in fifth position is not an original element. But, the photographer may get protection over the angle of the shot, amount of the legs showing, clothing style and background, particularly if there is some unique element to them (like intentionally ripped leg warmers or oddly colored ballet slippers).
     

Putting This into Practice
Drawing from nature is a wonderful start many artists have used to initiate the beginnings of great work. While protections are available, they will likely extend only over those additions. You cannot "corner the market" in making true-to-nature depictions of an idea. So, the trick for the artist, in life and in law, is to add something new.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.artlawteam.com/admin/trackback/140332
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.